Association for Academic SurgerySporadic early-onset colon cancer expresses unique molecular features
Introduction
Colon cancer (CC) is an important contributor to worldwide cancer mortality and morbidity as there are about 1.2 million new cases diagnosed and 0.6 million deaths from this disease reported every year around the world.1 In the United States, 45,890 new colon cancer cases are expected to be diagnosed in men and 47,200 in women in 2015.2 Although the overall incidence and mortality of colon cancer have declined over the past 30 years in both men and women,3 the number of early-onset colon cancer (EOCC), in individuals younger than 50 years, continued to rise alarmingly.4
Using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program Cancer Registries database, we demonstrated in our previous clinical study that incidence rates of CC are continuously increasing in every age group (5-y intervals) from 20 to 49 y, with the most impressive increase seen within the age group 40-44 y. As expected, incidence rates of CC decreased in all age groups from 55 to 85 y.5 We also used Arizona Cancer Registry database to analyze the incidence rates of EOCRC in Arizona.6 This study revealed that there is a significant increase (102%) in incidence of CC seen in the age group 10-29.6
Overall declines in late-onset colon cancers (LOCC) in patients older than 50 years have been mostly attributed to changes in risk factors and the introduction of screening primarily in the form of colonoscopy.7 However, evidence accumulating steadily over the last decade now threatens this optimistic expectation.8 Trends toward poorer survival have been seen in EOCC patients.9 Most (70%-80%) of these EOCC are sporadic and not attributed to any hereditary cause.4, 10, 11, 12 They tend to have more aggressive features like mucinous, poorly differentiated histopathology, and signet ring morphology, and are often diagnosed at a more advanced stage.4, 5, 10, 13 The most common location of early-onset colon cancer is observed in sigmoid colon and recto-sigmoid colon.5, 14
Colon cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease with clinically and pathologically similar tumors differing in molecular signatures and in response to therapy and patient survival.15
Only a few pilot genetic studies focused on EOCC have been performed up to date despite the fact that it is a growing problem, still remains poorly understood, and the etiology is unclear.4, 10, 11, 12 It is believed sporadic EOCC pathogenesis involves accumulation of various genetic and/or epigenetic modifications that regulate proliferation and apoptosis in addition to telomere maintenance and genomic integrity. Cell structure, cell-cell interactions, and polarity, angiogenesis and changes in the tumor microenvironment also play an important role in EOCC pathogenesis.16
To date, only a few studies have tried to uncover critical genes and pathways important in the initiation and progression of CRC, especially looking at WNT, RAS-MAPK, PI3K, TGFβ, P53, and DNA mismatch-repair pathways.17 It is also known that most EOCRC tumors do not seem to harbor activating BRAF or KRAS mutations,13 whereas a genome-wide LINE-1 hypo-methylation seems to be a frequent epigenetic alteration found in EOCRC tumors.14, 18
The biggest limitation of current genomic studies focusing on EOCRC is that they all are designed to use downstream genetic applications such as PCR-based techniques and microarrays requiring high-quality RNA, thus limited to analysis of fresh frozen samples only. As there is insufficient amount of fresh frozen tissues especially for the EOCRC cases, these studies use only limited number of samples to assess gene expression profiles. There are, however, more samples of EOCRC tissues available in FFPE (formalin fixed, paraffin embedded) format. Thus, there is a need to find novel methods to analyze these samples. To overcome the limitation of low-quality RNA usually isolated from FFPE samples, methods which do not include any reverse transcription and amplification steps need to be tested. The NanoString nCounter platform is a novel method suitable for gene expression analysis of samples archived as FFPE blocks or as tissue sections preserved on slides, thus might potentially allow to analyze larger cohorts of EOCRC samples. The aim of our study was to attempt to elucidate the molecular uniqueness of sporadic EOCC using a more advanced platform that uses archived FFPE samples.
Section snippets
Patient samples
De-identified FFPE CC samples and matching noninvolved colon tissues from a group of patients younger than 50 (early-onset group) and a group of patients older than 65 y (late-onset group) were obtained from the University of Arizona Pathology archives. There was equal representation of males and females as well as stage I-II and stage III-IV samples with the pathology of moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (Supplemental Table 1). Patients with Lynch syndrome, familial adenomatous
Results
We used the NanoString nCounter PanCancer Pathways Panel gene expression code set21 to assess alterations in gene expression patterns in two age groups of patients with sporadic colon cancer, patients <50 y (early-onset group) and patients >65 y (late-onset group). Patients with Lynch syndrome, familial adenomatous polyposis, and inflammatory bowel disease were excluded from the study. The average age for early-onset group was 42.5 y and 72 y for the late-onset group. There was equal percentage
Discussion
We observed in our previous studies that the incidence of CC has continue to rise in populations <50 y.5, 6 Despite this alarming increase, there is still paucity in molecular data driving the EOCC initiation and progression. In our study, we attempt to uncover unique alterations in gene expression patterns and pathway mechanisms involved in sporadic EOCC carcinogenesis. We demonstrate that gene expression profiles differ significantly between sporadic early-onset and late-onset colon tumors.
Acknowledgment
This study has not been supported by anyone.
Author contributions: J.J. and V.N. contributed to the study conception and acquisition of data. J.J. and W.X. performed the statistical analysis. All authors contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of manuscript, and critical revision.
References (37)
- et al.
Is it time to lower the recommended screening age for colorectal cancer?
J Am Coll Surg
(2011) - et al.
The increasing incidence of young-onset colorectal cancer: a call to action
Mayo Clin Proc
(2014) - et al.
Tumor microsatellite instability in early onset gastric cancer
J Mol Diagn
(2005) - et al.
Clinicopathologic and molecular features of sporadic early-onset colorectal adenocarcinoma: an adenocarcinoma with frequent signet ring cell differentiation, rectal and sigmoid involvement, and adverse morphologic features
Mod Pathol
(2012) - et al.
The hallmarks of cancer
Cell
(2000) - et al.
Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation
Cell
(2011) - et al.
Beta-catenin regulates the expression of the matrix metalloproteinase-7 in human colorectal cancer
Am J Pathol
(1999) - et al.
ETV4 and Myeov knockdown impairs colon cancer cell line proliferation and invasion
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
(2006) - et al.
PI3K/Akt signalling pathway and cancer
Cancer Treat Rev
(2004) - et al.
Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008
Int J Cancer
(2010)