ALK, ROS1 and RET rearrangements in lung squamous cell carcinoma are very rare
Introduction
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortalities worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer accounts for over 85% of all lung cancer cases and is associated with 5-year survival rates of 15% [1], [2]. Adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinomas are the most frequent histological subtypes, occurring in 50% and 30% of NSCLC cases, respectively [3]. In the last decades, encouraging new treatments [i.e., the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of EGFR and ALK] have afforded benefits to patients with adenocarcinoma, but few advances have been made in the treatment of SCC [3]. Since many genomic abnormalities have been identified in SCC, there is a growing biological significance to deciphering the molecular characterization of patients with SCC in modern profiling platforms. Therefore, it is essential to characterize the biological relevance and the true frequency of each alteration in SCC.
ALK rearrangements in NSCLC define a molecular subgroup of lung adenocarcinoma that is highly sensitive to targeted crizotinib treatment [1], which is the only agent approved for ALK-rearranged NSCLC by China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA). Activity against ALK-rearranged NSCLC has also been described in second-generation ALK inhibitors such as ceritinib and alectinib, which can potentially overcome the resistance to the treatment of crizotinib in patients with ALK positive, metastatic NSCLC. In NSCLC, ALK fusions have been reported to occur at a frequency of 2–5% in the unselected NSCLC population [4], [5], and are more prevalent in younger patients with adenocarcinoma who have never smoked or are light smokers. ROS1 (c-ros oncogene 1) and RET (ret proto-oncogene) fusions were identified at a small frequency (∼1–2%) of lung cancer cases, using a variety of genotyping techniques [6], [7], [8], [9]. Similar to the ALK fusions, the ROS1 fusions can lead to constitutive kinase activity and are associated with sensitivity to TKIs such as crizotinib [10], which has been shown as an effective ROS1 inhibitor, superior to chemotherapy. RET fusions are potential therapeutic targets of existing multi-targeted kinase inhibitors, including cabozantinib, vandetanib, sunitinib and sorafenib [8], [9], [11]. Notably, ROS1 and RET rearrangements are mutually exclusive with other genetic alterations, such as EGFR, KRAS or ALK.
It is a common belief that true ALK, ROS1, and RET translocations in SCC are very rare [12], [13]. The estimated prevalence of ALK gene fusion is ∼1% in lung SCC [3], [14], [15]. Recent molecular testing guidelines conducted a meta-analysis among lung cancer patients in SCC in which only 1 of 523 (0.2%) was found to carry an ALK rearrangement [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. The data are also supported by other studies specifically reporting the frequency of 0% ALK translocation in SCC patients [23], [24], [25]. Since the current practice guidelines recommend a molecular testing for lung adenocarcinoma or mixed lung cancer with an ADC component to select patients for targeted TKI therapy, reported cases of lung squamous cancer harboring gene rearrangements challenge the molecular diagnosis based on histologic subtypes [12], [15], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30]. However, doubts have been cast on reports showing ALK and/or ROS1 rearrangements in squamous lung cancer, as the small biopsy specimens were not representative of the whole tumor characteristics, and an immunohistochemistry panel was not available to validate the squamous differentiation. Moreover, Davis et al. recently reported two ROS1-positive cases in SCC and claimed that the proportion of SCC found may not reflect that of the general population of patients in NSCLC [12].
Molecular diagnostic algorithms have undergone a significant evolution over time, moving from a “one-gene, one-test” paradigm to the inclusion of multiplex assays for common hotspot mutations, gene rearrangements, and copy number changes in relevant lung cancer genes. However, current clinically validated methods for detection of ALK, ROS1, and RET fusions are characterized by one single gene detection, such as fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. Due to the low frequency of these fusions and the high incidence of NSCLC, current methods also have their own limitations in terms of cost, throughput, and required expertise necessary for interpreting these tests. We previously designed a single-tube multiplexed assay to simultaneously detect fusion transcripts of ALK, ROS1, and RET genes and to measure the imbalanced 3′/5′ expression levels without prior knowledge of the fusion partners [31]. For the gene expression assay, 4 probes, which were designed to measure the expression levels of target genes, are placed upstream and 4 probes are placed downstream of the fusion junction. The fusion events are complemented by the fusion-specific probe sets to detect the common and reported fusion variants. Advances of the NanoString fusion gene panel have provided a means of interrogating a variety of therapeutically relevant fusions in a single tube, and have also been validated in 100% concordance with FISH, the only FDA-approved “gold standard” method for fusion gene detection.
Using NanoString fusion panel, Fang et al. identified two ALK-rearranged SCC xenograft models, one carrying the well-known EML4-ALK variants 3a/b and the other harboring a novel huntingtin interacting protein 1 (HIP1)–ALK fusion gene [32]. Both were diagnosed as moderately differentiated SCC by a pathologist, and then further validated by an immunohistochemistry panel positive for CK5/6, p63, 34βE12 and negative for MOC31 and BerEP4. Given that these rare fusions predominantly exist in lung adenocarcinoma, the reported cases of these gene fusions identified in SCC raise the question of whether this histologic subtype should be evaluated for the rare fusions’ molecular tests. In order to determine the prevalence of the ALK, ROS1, and RET fusions in lung cancer resected specimens with squamous cell carcinoma, we screened a total of 214 cases of SCC samples by NanoString fusion assay, combining two cohorts of surgically resected samples collected from Korean and Chinese patients.
Section snippets
Patient cohorts
NSCLC specimens were obtained from Samsung Medical Center (SMC, Seoul, Republic of Korea) and Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (GPHTCM, Guangzhou, China) with prior, fully informed consent from the patients and with approval from the ethical committees/internal review boards. Control lung cancer cell lines NCI-H2228 (ALK positive) and A549 (ALK, ROS1 and RET wild type) were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA); control lung cancer cell line HCC78 (ROS1 positive) was
Detection of fusion transcripts from NSCLC SCC specimens by NanoString fusion assay
We previously designed the single-tube, multiplexed assay system that relied on a complementary strategy of interrogation of 3′ gene overexpression and detection of specific fusion transcript variants [31]. To visualize results obtained from the combined strategies in a total of 214 surgically resected lung SCC specimens, we plotted the ratio of 3′/5′ expression to fusion reporter counts for each sample for ALK, ROS1, and RET (Fig. 1A–C).
Discussion
Over the past decade, major advances have been made in our understanding of the therapeutically-relevant genetic alterations in EGFR, KRAS, ALK, ROS1, and RET genes in NSCLC. Identification of ALK rearrangements in patients with NSCLC is crucial to guide patients to therapy with highly effective ALK TKIs. These events occur almost exclusively in adenocarcinoma but not in SCC of the lung, which supports the molecular diagnosis based on histologic subtypes [14], [38], [39]. However, growing
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Shibing Deng for statistical advice, and Mr. Patrick Forrester and Miss Louise Mao for written English revision.
References (45)
- et al.
Testing for ALK rearrangement in lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter comparison of immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization
Mod. Pathol.
(2013) - et al.
EML4-ALK fusion lung cancer: a rare acquired event
Neoplasia
(2008) - et al.
ALK gene rearrangements: a new therapeutic target in a molecularly defined subset of non-small cell lung cancer
J. Thorac. Oncol.
(2009) - et al.
Molecular testing guideline for selection of lung cancer patients for EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors: guideline from the College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology
J. Thorac. Oncol.
(2013) - et al.
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase immunoreactivity correlates with ALK gene rearrangement and transcriptional up-regulation in non-small cell lung carcinomas
Hum. Pathol.
(2009) - et al.
EML4-ALK lung cancers are characterized by rare other mutations, a TTF-1 cell lineage, an acinar histology, and young onset
Mod. Pathol.
(2009) - et al.
Increased ALK gene copy number and amplification are frequent in non-small cell lung cancer
J. Thorac. Oncol.
(2011) - et al.
EML4-ALK fusion transcripts, but no NPM-, TPM3-, CLTC-, ATIC-, or TFG-ALK fusion transcripts, in non-small cell lung carcinomas
Lung Cancer
(2008) - et al.
Detection of ALK gene rearrangement in non-small cell lung cancer: a comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization and chromogenic in situ hybridization with correlation of ALK protein expression
J. Thorac. Oncol.
(2011) - et al.
EML4-ALK fusion is linked to histological characteristics in a subset of lung cancers
J. Thorac. Oncol.
(2008)
A rare case of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung harbouring ALK and BRAF activating mutations
Lung Cancer
CH5424802 (RO5424802) for patients with ALK-rearranged advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (AF-001JP study): a single-arm, open-label, phase 1–2 study
Lancet Oncol.
ALK/EML4 fusion gene may be found in pure squamous carcinoma of the lung
J. Thorac. Oncol.
Global survey of phosphotyrosine signaling identifies oncogenic kinases in lung cancer
Cell
Activity and safety of crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: updated results from a phase 1 study
Lancet Oncol.
A single-tube multiplexed assay for detecting ALK, ROS1, and RET fusions in lung cancer
J. Mol. Diagn.
HIP1-ALK, a novel ALK fusion variant that responds to crizotinib
J. Thorac. Oncol.
The 2004 world health organization classification of lung tumors
Semin. Roentgenol.
Multiplexed gene expression and fusion transcript analysis to detect ALK fusions in lung cancer
J. Mol. Diagn.
ALK-rearranged lung cancer: adenosquamous lung cancer masquerading as pure squamous carcinoma
J. Thorac. Oncol.
Histologic subtypes, immunohistochemistry, FISH or molecular screening for the accurate diagnosis of ALK-rearrangement in lung cancer: a comprehensive study of Caucasian non-smokers
Lung Cancer
Can we eliminate squamous cell carcinoma of the lung from testing of EML4-ALK fusion gene
Lung Cancer
Cited by (57)
Analyses of multi-omics differences between patients with high and low PD1/PDL1 expression in lung squamous cell carcinoma
2020, International ImmunopharmacologyClinical characteristics and progression of pre-/minimally invasive lung adenocarcinoma harboring ALK or RET rearrangements: a retrospective cohort study
2023, Translational Lung Cancer Research